Methodist Journal


Cardiovascular Imaging

Vol 16, Issue 2 (2020)



Cardiovascular Imaging: A Window into Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management

See More

Guest Editor Dipan J. Shah Lends Expertise and Insight to Special Issue on Cardiovascular Imaging

See More


Cardiac Computed Tomography for Comprehensive Coronary Assessment: Beyond Diagnosis of Anatomic Stenosis

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies

Cardiac Computed Tomography for Structural Heart Disease Assessment and Therapeutic Planning: Focus on Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction

Fluorodeoxyglucose Applications in Cardiac PET: Viability, Inflammation, Infection, and Beyond

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Valvular Heart Disease: Assessment of Severity and Myocardial Remodeling

Patient-Specific Modeling for Structural Heart Intervention: Role of 3D Printing Today and Tomorrow

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Positron Emission Tomography


COVID-19: A Potential Risk Factor for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Cardiac Lymphoma Presenting with Recurrent STEMI

Complete Heart Block in Systemic Sclerosis with Characterization on Cardiac MRI

Repair of Extent III Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm in the Presence of Aortoiliac Occlusion


A T2-Weighty Discovery: Aortitis on Cardiac MRI with Histopathologic Correlation



Case-Based Points on the Role of Imaging in Kidney Disease


Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiogenic Shock


Cardio-Oncology, Then and Now: An Interview with Barry Trachtenberg


Onconephrology: An Evolving Field


Letter to the Editor in Response to “Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus”

Vol 13, Issue 3 (2017)

Article Full Text


The Rise of the Imaging Specialist

Jump to:
Article Citation:

Gerik L. The Rise of the Imaging Specialist. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J website. hm-journal.local. November 29, 2017.

transcatheter aortic valve replacement , TAVR , computed tomography , fusion imaging , fluoroscopy

Rapid advances in imaging modalities are fueling the rise of minimally invasive cardiac procedures and dramatically reshaping interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery. For patients, this means less trauma and faster recovery. For interventionalists and surgeons, it means increasingly relying on specially trained imaging specialists and technology for guidance. Imagers become the surgeons’ eyes, using the latest 3D imaging technologies to create detailed maps of their patients’ unique anatomy, planning access routes and device sizes with precision to ensure safe and accurate minimally invasive procedures.

“In my experience, imaging plays an exceptionally important role in how surgeons plan their procedures,” says Faisal Nabi, M.D., cardiologist and imaging specialist at Houston Methodist Hospital. “In the old days, the surgeon split the chest and the surgeon was viewing everything. He’s cutting, he’s excising the annulus. Now there’s no cutting. All of this is done noninvasively with very powerful equipment to image inside the chest with accuracy but without an incision. As imagers, we provide surgeons with a lot of information that hopefully makes their job a little easier with fewer surprises when they get to the surgical suite.”

The fluoroscopy C-arm rotates around a patient during a percutaneous procedure.

Although this means fewer hands on—or in—the patient, the room around the patient becomes surprisingly crowded. “Minimally invasive procedures require a lot of manpower,” says Mohammad Hussain, M.D. Hussain is a Houston Methodist internal medicine resident learning the ins and outs of cardiac imaging from Nabi. In Hussain’s early experiences with minimally invasive procedures, he was struck by both the powerful new imaging technology and the sheer number of specialists packed around the patient. Indeed, procedures such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that are guided by fusion imaging require a structural imager and a biomedical engineer in addition to an interventional cardiologist, surgeon, anesthesiologist, and support staff. Add in the fluoroscopy unit’s 6-foot C-arm rotating around the patient to capture real-time images, and everyone has to stay on their toes.

Nabi and Hussain recently published a review article in the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal discussing the roles of computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy, and fusion imaging in percutaneous cardiovascular procedures. TAVR is one of the new techniques made possible by the latest imaging modalities and imaging specialists. A single TAVR procedure often involves 3D CT, transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography (TEE, TTE), and fluoroscopy—and a team of imaging experts to translate the complex images into clinically useful information for interventionalists.

“Our role starts months before the procedure itself,” Hussain explains. “We use imaging technology to give surgeons and interventionalists accurate measurements so that they can tailor each procedure.” Nabi adds, “A lot of these CT scans are done before the actual test to make sure the patient qualifies for the test and to help surgeons define what kind of valve is needed and plan the procedure. Then there’s another host of imaging that goes on in the lab itself. It’s very comprehensive.”

Three-dimensional (3D) CT is replacing 2D echocardiography as the modality of choice for pre-TAVR imaging. It provides a much more detailed view of a patient’s vessels and valves, and because it can assess every axis of the oval-shaped aortic annulus, it consistently provides more accurate measurements that help interventionalists pick the correct device. Moreover, it scans a much larger area than TEE or TTE, which is key for procedures that involve passing catheters from the femoral artery to the heart. Nabi explains:

Drs. Mohammad Hussain and Faisal Nabi in the Methodist Institute for Technology, Innovation & Education hybrid operating room.

“With CT, you can think of it as a one-stop shop. It’s going to image not only the area you need for annulus sizing but also the entire thorax all the way down to the pelvis. You’re seeing all the access vessels, discovering other incidental findings, getting information about the coronaries, and learning about plaque in the aorta and how much calcium is in the root. All of these things influence the procedure.”

Once the patient is in the surgical suite, the challenge is translating the preprocedural CT images into practical roadmaps for the procedure. That’s where fusion imaging comes in. Fusion imaging combines multiple imaging modalities into a single view. For instance, modalities that emphasize form (e.g., CT, MRI, fluoroscopy) can be combined with those that show function (e.g., echocardiography, PET), producing a hybrid view that shows what is happening where.

In TAVR procedures, fusion imaging layers preprocedure 3D CT images onto real-time 2D fluoroscopy (essentially live-action X-ray) during procedures. Thus, interventionalists can look at detailed virtual images of their patients’ vessels and valves as they guide devices through the body. Fusion imaging provides a window into the patient’s body, allowing physicians to see what they’re doing, anticipate problems, and make adjustments as needed.

“The imager is there to help them with any imaging that’s involved and answer any questions regarding the different views they’re seeing with the imaging modalities,” Nabi explains. The structural imager—often a different physician from the one who did the CT—also has advanced training in 3D TEE and TTE in case those modalities are needed. The engineer does the actual fusion—a process called “registration”—during the procedure. He or she uses unique calcifications on valves and within vessels as landmarks, matching like structures to correctly overlay the CT and fluoroscopy images.

As imaging tools become more complex and powerful, specially trained imaging specialists are becoming even more important members of the heart valve team. “Coming from general medicine, I feel that previously the general cardiologist could read the echo and see what’s happening. But now imaging has become so intricate and specialized that consulting with a cardiac imaging specialist is essential,” Hussain says.

Indeed, Nabi has seen the cardiovascular imaging field “blossom” and the imager’s relationship with interventionalists and surgeons strengthen. “We have such sophisticated toys, CT and MRI, so you need specialists with advanced training. There’s a lot of training involved before people can do this well.” Nabi spent an additional 2 years training in cardiovascular imaging after his general cardiology fellowship. In today’s new world of minimally invasive interventions, highly trained imagers are vital to a procedure’s success.


Educating in the Era of Information Overload: An Interview with Rick Nishimura, M.D.

Laura Gerik, MS

Add Comments

Please login to dialogue with author.